![]() |
DETECTIVES IN THE CLASSROOM | ||||
Event Specifications
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. |
Students will be presented with one or more descriptions of public health problems such as an outbreak of food poisoning, a cluster of cases of West Nile encephalitis, or state data on bicycle injuries. |
|
2. |
Based on these descriptions, they will be expected to do the following: |
|
a. |
Generate hypotheses and recognize various fundamental
study designs. |
|
b. |
Evaluate the data by calculating and comparing simple rates and proportions. |
|
c. |
Identify patterns, trends and possible modes of transmission, sources, or risk factors. |
|
d. |
Propose interventions based on promoting positive health behaviors, eliminating or reducing environmental sources, or breaking clearly identifiable chains of transmission. |
|
3. |
Students will also be expected to: |
|
a. |
Define basic epidemiologic and public health terms (e.g., outbreak, epidemic, pandemic, surveillance, risk, vector, fomite, zoonosis). |
|
b. |
Recognize various categories of disease-causing agents and give examples of illnesses caused by each. |
|
c. |
Recognize and understand differences between the major groups of infectious agents (e.g., viruses, bacteria, protistans, fungi and animals). |
|
d. |
Calculations and mathematical manipulations should be consistent with middle school math skills and should be part of the competition. Data may be contrived or modified to make it more appropriate for this age group as long as it does not radically alter results or interpretation. |
|
e. |
Concepts and principles should be limited to those presented on CDC's EXCITE website (www.cdc.gov/excite). Problem sets, however, may be taken from any source. |
|
f. |
This event may be run as stations. |
|
Scoring:
1. |
Points will be assigned to the various questions and problems. Both the nature of the questions and scoring rubric should emphasize an understanding that is broad and basic rather than detailed and advanced. |
2. |
Depending on the problem, scoring may be based on a combination of answers, including graphs / charts, explanations, analysis, calculations, and closed-ended responses to specific questions. |
3. |
Points should be awarded for both quality and accuracy of answers, the quality of supporting reasoning, and the use of proper scientific methods. |
4. |
Each completed graph or table is worth up to five points; open-ended questions that require a paragraph of explanation to report the proper interpretation are worth up to ten points; closed-ended responses are worth up to five points each. |
5. |
Ties may be broken using a separate set of questions that do not enter into the regular score. If teams tied on the basis of their regular scores also have the same total score on the tie-breaker questions, individual scores on a pre-selected sequence of tie-breaker questions can be used to resolve the ties. |
Sample Problems:
Students will read a series of reports or summaries of reports adapted from newspapers, scientific publications, or Internet sites dealing with outbreaks or other public health problems in a community or population. They will then answer a series of questions related to the epidemiology of the problem and potential intervention or prevention activities.
Resources: The following websites and their links contain material that may be useful to event supervisors, coaches and competitors.