{"id":253,"date":"2013-02-26T10:42:26","date_gmt":"2013-02-26T15:42:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.montclair.edu\/creativeresearch\/?p=253"},"modified":"2019-05-16T13:25:22","modified_gmt":"2019-05-16T17:25:22","slug":"two-new-pedagogies-msu-aj-kelton-on-emerging-learning-design-kirk-mcdermid-on-the-helix-as-a-model-for-learning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/2013\/02\/26\/two-new-pedagogies-msu-aj-kelton-on-emerging-learning-design-kirk-mcdermid-on-the-helix-as-a-model-for-learning\/","title":{"rendered":"Three New Approaches to Pedagogy: AJ Kelton on Disruptive Learning Design &amp; Kirk McDermid on The Helix as a Model for Learning &amp; Cigdem Talgar on The Uses of Emerging Technology in the Classroom"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[Over the past several months,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creativeresearch\"> the CRC <\/a>has been in stimulating correspondence and informal communication with three thought-leaders at Montclair State University: AJ Kelton, Director of <a href=\"http:\/\/eit.montclair.edu\">Emerging and Instructional Technology<\/a> in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences; Cigdem Talgar, Acting Director of The Research Academy for University Learning and Editor-in-Chief of Montclair State&#8217;s first virtual scholarly journal, <strong><em>ELDJ<\/em><\/strong>; and Kirk McDermid, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy and incoming Chair of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/chss\/general-education-requirements\/\">General Education<\/a> Committee. Herewith their recent projects &amp; thoughts. &#8212; NB]<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>AJ Kelton\u00a0<\/em><em>on Emerging\/Disruptive Learning Design &amp; the 2013 Conference @ Montclair State University<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dear Neil: \u00a0I enjoyed our recent meeting and am thrilled you &#8220;get&#8221; our vision for the upcoming 3rd Annual\u00a0<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/eld.montclair.edu\/\">ELD Conference<\/a>\u00a0at Montclair State on June 7th<\/strong>. \u00a0In that regard, I must say that the info you gave me on Joseph Schumpeter and his theory of &#8220;creative disruption&#8221;\u00a0is relevant and fascinating to me. \u00a0I think this is a process that anything goes through when it experiences dramatic change &#8211; the phoenix rising from the ashes, so to speak. \u00a0You and I also talked about \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cognitive_load\">Cognitive Load Theory.\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0If you want a kind of thick, but research intensive book on this, I recommend the work of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Cognitive-Load-Theory-Jan-Plass\/dp\/0521677580\">Jan Plass<\/a>. He is one of the faculty members in my PhD program and one of the leading experts on the topic. The other topic of interest we touched upon in our chat was <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dual-coding_theory\">Allan Paivio&#8217;s <\/a>dual-coding theory.<span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<div>\n<div><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">The mission of the Emerging Learning Design Conference is to showcase best practices in design and implementation by bringing together those interested in engaging in vibrant and dynamic discourse regarding pedagogy; and how technology can better enhance it. \u00a0The theme for this year&#8217;s event is <strong>LEARNING AS DISRUPTION<\/strong>.\u00a0\u201dHow learning occurs\u201d has become the disruptive force that influences an educator\u2019s decision process in all that occurs in the classroom, including pedagogy, curriculum design, and incorporation of technology into a course. Since <a href=\"http:\/\/www.claytonchristensen.com\/\">Clayton Christensen\u2019s 2008 book <em><strong>Disrupting Class<\/strong><\/em> <\/a>began to influence the national (and global) conversation, learning as a disruptive force has been a hot topic in professional development, on campuses, and at conferences. When learning becomes the focus of education, the students\u2019 experiences become relevant and motivating factors that drive what occurs in the learning experience, <em>in or out<\/em> of a classroom. \u00a0<span style=\"font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif;\">As Judi Apte points out in her 2003 article\u00a0<\/span><em style=\"font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif;\">Facilitating Transformative Learning<\/em><span style=\"font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif;\">, &#8220;learning is about transformation, it&#8217;s about change, it&#8217;s about seeing yourself in relation to the world differently&#8221; (p. 168). \u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><strong>The 2013 ELD Conference Theme \u201cLearning As Disruption\u201d<\/strong> is designed to help presenters and attendees alike address this important issue.<\/span><\/div>\n<div><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<div><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">The philosophy of the ELD conference is to provide an atmosphere for learning and networking where what goes on <em>between<\/em> sessions is of value to the material presented <em>during<\/em> sessions. \u00a0In only its\u00a0third\u00a0year, the ELD has attracted attendees and presenters from dozens of institutions both locally and across the United States. \u00a0The combination of concurrent sessions, workshops, and our exciting<em><strong> Ignite! &amp; Engage!<\/strong> <\/em>sessions are designed to provide as broad a range of &#8220;takeaways&#8221; as possible.<\/span><\/div>\n<div><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<div><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">The ELD conference is employing a rolling peer-review process for submissions. \u00a0As part of this process, I am happy to tell you that we have already secured some great presentations, such as:<\/span><\/div>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><strong>*Christopher Donoghue<\/strong> will show how to increase the frequency and quality of instructor-student interaction in distance education using <em><strong>Qualtrics,<\/strong><\/em> in \u201cVirtual Instructor-Student Interaction in an Asynchronous Learning Network\u201d.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><strong>*Michael Kolitsky<\/strong> will show how to enable different modes of learning, on-demand, with \u201cWhere Does 3D Printing Fit Into Your Pedagogical Thinking?\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><strong>*John T Oliver<\/strong> will make a case for the pedagogical value of open, collaborative knowledge construction in \u201cMaking Student Wikipedians: Encouraging disruptive scholarly communication\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><strong>*Sophie Idromenos<\/strong> will demonstrate game design using<em><strong> Scratch<\/strong><\/em> in a hands-on workshop called &#8220;The Scratch Disruption: Video Game Design with Scratch.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div>\n<div>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">The conference organizers have just announced that\u00a0<strong>select proceedings<\/strong>\u00a0from the conference\u00a0<strong>will be published in the new <em>Journal of Emerging Learning Design (ELDJ)<\/em><\/strong>. \u00a0<strong>[See Cigdem Talgar essay below]<\/strong>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><span style=\"font-family: 'times new roman', serif;\">The papers for the select proceedings are not due at the time of submission for the call for proposals. \u00a0Presentations at the ELD13 conference will be reviewed by the <em>Journal of Emerging Learning Design<\/em> Editorial Board and invitations to appear in the proceedings will be issued not long afterward. \u00a0Papers for accepted invitations would be due late summer\/early fall 2013 and the proceedings issue of the ELDJ to be published in early 2014.\u00a0For questions or details please email\u00a0<a title=\"Compose mail to \">eldj@mail.montclair.edu.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>[EDITOR&#8217;S NOTE: As if to underscore AJ&#8217;s message herewith, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/03\/06\/opinion\/friedman-the-professors-big-stage.html?hp&amp;_r=0\">Tom Friedman&#8217;s New York Times \u00a0Op-Ed piece on MOOCs and disruptive learning <\/a>landed on our desk this morning, and \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/hbr.org\/2012\/12\/surviving-disruption\/ar\/1\">\u00a0The Harvard Business Review<\/a> just arrived in the CRC mailbox with its cover story by Clayton Christensen and Maxwell Wessel on <em><strong>Surviving Disruption.<\/strong><\/em>]<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>* * * * * * * * * *<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Kirk McDermid on The Helix as a Model for Learning<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Dear Neil: \u00a0As the new-ish Chair of the General Education Committee (charged with overseeing the General Education Program at Montclair State, a 41-credit blended content distribution and skill development \u2018menu\u2019 of courses) \u2013 we have a large and diverse program to manage.\u00a0 And improve.\u00a0 And \u2018sell\u2019 to students.\u00a0 The problems we face are exacerbated because our Program is not a unified, small set of \u2018core\u2019 courses, but a wide variety from almost every discipline.\u00a0 The Program is charged with exposing students to that wide range of disciplines, while also helping them develop a set of key competencies or Learning Goals such as critical thinking that crosses disciplinary lines. The <em><strong>helix<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0is a fruitful image for me to use in order to make sense of this task.\u00a0 No single course can accomplish the goals of our Gen Ed; no single discipline can, either \u2013 by definition in the case of the content requirements, but also in the case of the skills\/Goals.\u00a0 I took it as fundamental to the original vision of our Gen Ed that the learning and thinking competencies our students would acquire were to be understood as inherently interdisciplinary \u2013 critical thinking may have originated in philosophy and may even be exemplified in its \u201cpurest form\u201d therein (a philosopher may argue), but surely we want critical thinkers across academia and outside it as well. \u00a0As you and I agreed, real intellectual skill is not confined within disciplinary boundaries; if it is, I would call it \u201ctechnical proficiency\u201d instead.\u00a0 Students will only appreciate this if they can see such skills and abilities transcending disciplinary boundaries, and become self-aware of the interdisciplinarity of their learning.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/147\/2013\/02\/helix-learning1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/147\/2013\/02\/helix-learning1-300x263.jpg\" alt=\"helix learning[1]\" width=\"300\" height=\"263\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The <em><strong>helix image<\/strong><\/em> \u201ctrajectory\u201d shows a student\u2019s growth as dependent upon repeated exposures to distinct but related content\/disciplines, and skills\/competencies, in different combinations.\u00a0 As they gain such exposures, they will build upon their previous achievements to reach for more complex expressions or skill-sets \u2013 and we as their teachers &amp; mentors would urge and demand that, as well. \u00a0We know from psychological studies of learning that single exposures to material rarely result in learning; students need<em> repeated<\/em> exposure, in a diversity of environments and situations, to learn.\u00a0 The <em><strong>helix mode<\/strong><strong>l<\/strong><\/em> represents this in the rotation of the trajectory, as students return to the \u2018same\u2019 material repeatedly.\u00a0 Of course, it\u2019s not the same: it\u2019s different, as the students are somewhat changed from their previous exposure to that Goal or skill, as well as the other distinct but related ones.\u00a0 They are also more aware of the diversity of disciplines in which those skills could be deployed. \u00a0Perhaps the helix\u2019s radius should expand as it rises, to capture this growth in application; what starts as a skill \u2018locked\u2019 <em>in<\/em> a specific discipline becomes more flexibly employed <em>across<\/em> disciplines, as the student gains experience in seeing it deployed in new contexts.<\/p>\n<p>The helix also represents the importance of apparently unrelated learning in different disciplines or skills: part of the ascension is due to the unpredictable connections the student constructs, or the inspirations they can draw from previous learning experiences.\u00a0 As almost every student\u2019s learning trajectory is unique at Montclair State &#8212; apart from the very beginning courses, students have flexibility to sequence their Gen Ed in various ways &#8212; we cannot tell what their previous learning experiences might do to shape their understanding of their present courses.\u00a0 That\u2019s a bad thing as it makes our jobs as teachers more difficult, not being able to take student preparation for granted, but <em>also<\/em> a good thing as it makes our jobs more interesting, and \u2013 if we are willing to work at it \u2013 better for all students who can see student models of achievement to strive after, in their own classrooms.<\/p>\n<p>The helix is also very optimistic; the only thing we can control is the circulation around the perimeter.\u00a0 The student\u2019s progression upwards \u2013 the<em> incline<\/em> of the helix \u2013 is not under our control directly.\u00a0 This points to the pessimistic possibility that students may not in fact \u201cbe helical\u201d in their learning, but instead \u201ccircular\u201d \u2013 i.e., cycling, but not progressing.\u00a0 I would hope, though, that if this were the case, the repeated exposure to the same concepts, in diverse contexts, would trigger some substantial learning. \u00a0At the least, one would also expect that instructors and advisors would be able to detect with suitable assessments or feedback the \u2018slope\u2019 of any student\u2019s helix, and design interventions or instructional aids to steepen that trajectory.<\/p>\n<p>Ideally, we would have courses or learning experiences \u2018calibrated\u2019 for the student, such that they matched the students\u2019 ascending trajectory, instead of being jarringly too far above or below the students\u2019 present capabilities.\u00a0 Don\u2019t ask me how to manage that; we\u2019re just beginning with this concept.<\/p>\n<p>**********<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Cigdem Talgar on The Uses of Emerging Technology in the Classroom<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Dear Neil: Thank you for inviting me to share my informal thoughts with the CRC readership on the volatile, ever-changing field of emerging technology in the higher education classroom, where it offers an excellent &#8216;toolbox&#8217; for demonstrating creativity. \u00a0 For example, using \u2018virtual worlds\u2019 brings students in language classes to new and far-flung places where they can experience the cultures accompanying those languages.\u00a0 In biology, students of anatomy utilize augmented reality to delve into the human body multiple times.\u00a0 Students of psychology can network with students in various departments (i.e., physics) through social media to \u201cinvent\u201d things that are possible via cross-disciplinary, peer-to-peer collaboration.<\/p>\n<p>The availability of such technology is a testament to the creativity of the individuals who made it possible; however, it is a common misunderstanding that technology makes the professor creative.\u00a0 Technology does, indeed, offer opportunities; but what these opportunities are &#8212; and how they are utilized &#8212; is a function of the creative nature of the professor and the needs that he or she possesses to bring the material to light.\u00a0 The thought that infusing your classroom with technology will thereby lead your students to learn effectively is inherently flawed and, unfortunately, \u00a0all-too-common.<\/p>\n<p>Rather, I believe, the creation &#8212; or disruption &#8212; of so-called \u201cdeep learning\u201d environments depends upon factors such as student engagement, motivation, attention and cognitive load; these are not mutually exclusive but rather continuously interact.\u00a0 The successful use of technology in the classroom is linked to the success with which it promotes these factors.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Emerging learning designs<\/strong> offer students opportunities to express their creativity.\u00a0 Once again, they have to be given the opportunity or the problem or the limitation which requires them to go beyond their customary and comfortable use of the technology. \u00a0 This thought of creating limits &#8212; or \u201cblockages,\u201d as my colleague, Iain Kerr, instructor of the Creative Thinking course at the University says &#8212; forces the students to think \u201csideways\u201d about technology and other tools.\u00a0 Students can use this <strong>sideways thinking<\/strong> to utilize technology that they usually use &#8216;one way&#8217; to come up with creative solutions to problems posed by their instructors.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">The June 7<sup>th<\/sup> Emerging Learning Design Conference<\/span><\/strong> and the new <strong><em>Journal of Emerging Learning Design <\/em>(ELDJ)<\/strong> offer a forum for discussion and debate of these issues from the perspective of instructors as well as students.<\/p>\n<p>The <em><strong>ELDJ<\/strong>, \u00a0<\/em><strong>Montclair State University\u2019s first open access, Web-based peer-reviewed journal,<\/strong> \u00a0provides a platform for higher education practitioners to explore emerging learning design theories, concepts, and issues, and their implications at national and international levels. \u00a0An outgrowth of the annual Emerging Learning Design Conference, which as you know makes its home at Montclair State University, the ELDJ invites scholarly communications in the field and will present best practices in design and implementation by offering articles that propose or review engaging and dynamic approaches to pedagogy and how it can be enhanced through technology.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The inaugural issue of <em>ELDJ<\/em> will be published on March 22nd, 2013.<\/strong> \u00a0It will feature invited articles from Joshua Danish, Jonathan Richter and Sarah Smith-Robbins, presenters of keynote addresses at the\u00a0past two ELD conferences. \u00a0The second issue, due in early 2014, will feature an invited article by Christopher Hoadley, keynote speaker for ELD13, as well as selected proceedings from the <strong>ELD13<\/strong> conference.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[Over the past several months, the CRC has been in stimulating correspondence and informal communication with three thought-leaders at Montclair State University: AJ Kelton, Director of Emerging and Instructional Technology in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences; Cigdem Talgar, Acting Director of The Research Academy for University Learning and Editor-in-Chief of Montclair State&#8217;s first [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-creative-research-center-guest-essay"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1102,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253\/revisions\/1102"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/creative-research-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}